AUTOREGULATE-NONCARDIAC
A precision medicine platform investigating the implications and feasibility of cerebral autoregulation-based precision BP monitoring in noncardiac surgery
WHY
Perioperative hemodynamics matter.
Perioperative hypotension occurs frequently and is strongly associated with prognostically important postoperative complications such as perioperative myocardial injury (PMI) and acute kidney injury (AKI), as well as death. [1-5]
Perioperative hemodynamic management must be targeted.
A plentitude of observational data has shown a strong association of mean arterial blood pressures (MAP) < 65 mmHg with postoperative complications. This has given rise to guideline and consensus statements recommending avoidance of intraoperative MAPs < 60-70 mmHg. [6, 7]
However, the effectiveness of this practice has not been confirmed in the hypotension avoidance trials to date. Taken together, the BBB-Study and POISE-3, having cumulatively randomized nearly 8000 patients, did not find any clinically meaningful improvements in cardiovascular, renal or neurocognitive outcomes targeting higher absolute perioperative blood pressures (i.e. intraoperative MAP ≥ 75 mmHg resp. ≥ 80 mmHg). [8-11]
Considering that the mediators of hypotension-related perioperative organ injury are likely not BP excursions below population-based MAP thresholds but rather BP excursions below the autoregulatory thresholds of vital organs, these findings are not surprising. It is well-established that autoregulatory boundaries are highly patient- and organ-specific, a fact acknowledged by recent consensus statements. [7] As such, it is clear that one BP target cannot meet the needs of all patients and that personalized, targeted approaches to perioperative hemodynamic management are needed.
Novel targeted hemodynamic therapies are needed.
Current guidelines and consensus statements acknowledge the potential value of personalizing perioperative hemodynamic treatments, advocating for maintaining intraoperative MAPs within 20% of baseline. [6]
This practice, primarily based on physiologic rationale (i.e. the blood pressures patients tolerate preoperatively should also be tolerated intraoperatively), is supported by one trial (INPRESS) which investigated this strategy 298 patients predominantly undergoing abdominal surgery and found a reduction in the risk of postoperative organ dysfunction. [10] This treatment effect was driven primarily by reductions in the incidence of postoperative acute kidney injury and altered consciousness. These promising findings have given rise to subsequent trials further investigating this hemodynamic management strategy. [11] Data from IMPROVE-multi will certainly further inform the practice of targeting preoperative BPs during surgery.
However, the strategy of targeting preoperative BPs has important limitations. First, it is unclear how “baseline” BP should be determined, i.e. whether and how ambulatory 24h-BP measurements should be used to estimate the safe BP range during surgery. Second, it remains to be established how a strategy of obtaining 24h-BP measurements could be implemented in clinical practice, particularly in emergent settings, i.e. in the patients at the highest risk of postoperative complications and hence most in need of targeted hemodynamic management. Third and most importantly, the assumption that preoperative BPs should be safe intraoperatively may not be valid. Preliminary data from AUTOREGULATE-NONCARDIAC suggest that in a subset of patients, preoperatively tolerated BPs fall outside of cerebral autoregulatory boundaries, i.e. outside of the safe BP range for the brain. [12] These findings are consistent with data from cardiac surgery showing that preoperative BPs do not predict cerebral autoregulatory boundaries during cardiopulmonary bypass. [13] Finally, the adequacy of blood pressure in the perioperative setting is highly context-specific, i.e. the same BP could be both sufficient and insufficient at different phases of an operation when anesthestic and surgical factors can dynamically affect vital organ perfusion. [12]
Taken together, these factors underline the need for novel targeted hemodynamic therapies in the perioperative setting.
References
[5] Zarbock A, Weiss R, Albert F, et al. Epidemiology of surgery associated acute kidney injury (EPIS-AKI): a prospective international observational multi-center clinical study. Intensiv Care Med 2023; 1–15
[6] Halvorsen S, Mehilli J, Cassese S, et al. 2022 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular assessment and management of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Eur Hear J 2022; 43: 3826–924
[9] Marcucci M, Painter TW, Conen D, et al. Hypotension-Avoidance Versus Hypertension-Avoidance Strategies in Noncardiac Surgery: An International Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Intern Med 2023; 176: 605–14
[10] Garg AX, Marcucci M, et al. A sub-study of the POISE-3 randomized trial examined effects of a perioperative hypotension-avoidance strategy versus a hypertension-avoidance strategy on the risk of acute kidney injury. Kidney Int 2025; 107: 155–68
[11] Marcucci M, Chan MTV, Painter TW, et al. Effects of a Hypotension-Avoidance Versus a Hypertension-Avoidance Strategy on Neurocognitive Outcomes After Noncardiac Surgery. Ann Intern Med 2025, In press.
HOW
Take an integrative approach rooted in physiology.
The time has come for a new paradigm of hemodynamic management.
If we accept that blood pressure excursions below autoregulatory thresholds are the likely drivers of hypotension-related organ injury, the logical conclusion is that autoregulatory function of vital organs must be monitored, just as we monitor any other vital sign.
Over the past decades, a great deal of research has been dedicated to developing the technology and methodologies necessary for monitoring autoregulatory function, particularly of the brain, with the predominance of this research stemming from neurointensive care. [1-3] Thanks to the widespread availability of near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), with the right tools and knowledge it is now possible to monitor cerebral autoregulatory (cAR) function non-invasively and continuously. NIRS-based cAR monitoring has been successfully deployed in neurointensive care as well as perioperative settings (primarily in cardiac sugery).
However, to date a only few small studies have investigated NIRS-based cAR monitoring as a tool for optimizing hemodynamics in noncardiac surgery. Given the vast potential of this technology, a new approach to researching cAR monitoring and to facilitating its translation to clinical practice is needed.
AUTOREGULATE-NONCARDIAC fills an important gap in perioperative hemodynamic research.
The 2024 PeriOperative Quality Initiative (POQI) international consensus statement on perioperative arterial pressure management highlights the importance of autoregulatory function for organ perfusion and for the definition of clinically important hypotension. [4] It goes on to identify important questions to drive future research, including: [4]
Are there organ-specific hypotensive harm thresholds for the kidney, heart, intestines, liver, and brain?
Are hypotensive harm thresholds altered by perioperative factors?
What arterial pressure threshold minimises risk to all organs?
Do various causes of hypotension (vasodilation, hypovolaemia, bradycardia, or low cardiac output) affect the association between hypotension and organ injury?
Which vasopressor best protects organs from hypotensive injury?
As a platform for precision hemodynamic research, AUTOREGULATE-NONCARDIAC will address these and many other knowledge gaps in perioperative medicine. By virtue of its design — combining collection of high-resolution, multimodal physiologic signals and therapeutic data with robust short- and long-term assessment of patient-centered outcomes — AUTOREGULATE-NONCARDIAC is uniquely positioned to take an unprecedented, integrative approach to answering important questions in perioperative hemodynamics.
References
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
STUDY SYNOPSIS
Setting: Major noncardiac surgery
Objective: To assess the feasibility and potential clinical implications of cerebral autoregulation-based precision BP monitoring in patients at cardiovascular, renal and neurological risk undergoing major noncardiac surgery
Study design: Multicenter, prospective cohort study and precision medicine research platform
Participating centers: University Hospital Basel, HOCH Health Ostschweiz St. Gallen, Bern University Hospital
Status: Recruiting
Full study name: Association of Intraoperative Blood Pressure Excursions Below Cerebral Autoregulatory Boundaries With Organ Injury Following Major Noncardiac Surgery (AUTOREGULATE-NONCARDIAC)
Study registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05336864
Support: This study is being supported by the Swiss Society for Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine.
STUDY PROTOCOL
Will be forthcoming.